Jon Ingham
  • Home
  • Consulting
    • Technology analyst
  • Training
  • Writing
    • The Social Organization
    • Better HR departments
    • Innovating Reward
    • Strategic Human Capital Management
  • Speaking
    • Chairing and facilitating
  • Advice
  • Contact

Matching work and the workforce / the individual employment deal

22/7/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
One of the things I think is quite interesting about changes in work and the workforce is how many of these are aligned - for example we need work to be cut up differently from the old 9 to 5, 40 hours per week approach, and increasingly people want to fit work in to their lives in smaller, more flexible chunks as well.

Of course, this doesn't always apply and even when it does, matching demand and supply when both are much more complicated than they were before is quite tough to do - but at least the potential is there.

For example the typical middle level manager that you might want to send abroad or have commuting to two of three countries every week may not want this sort of experience given their links and responsibilities at home, but a younger manager without these responsibilities might relish the challenge this type of working would provide (again as I've just been posting, these are just stereotypes and what's really important is to personalise our people management approaches, understanding each individual's engagement drivers and offering them an individual employment deal.)

That's why, whilst I was an HR Director at Ernst & Young, we tried to articulate the pyschological contract between the firm and our employees (see the picture, taken from Michael Wellin's book, Managing the Pyschological Contract, at the organisation and team level but also to try to get our employees to think about it too - what do they give to the firm, and what do they receive back?

The more that we could do this, the greater our ability to personalise the deal and provide what the employee wanted, and the higher the likelihood the employee would feel rationally as well as emotionally engaged and therefore have greater likelihood to stay in the organisation.  It implies risk as well though - once you start to articulate the deal like this it becomes even more important to deliver upon the articulated expectations.  If you're not going to deliver it's much more effective just not to talk about it.  Which is, I think, a large part of the reason why most organisations don't do it.  But also why if you really do want to be people centric, that it's a very good reason why you should.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    My Strategic HCM Blog

    Categories

    All
    Blog
    Changes In The Workforce
    HR And Competitive Positioning

    Author

    Advice from Jon Ingham, strategic HR consultant.

    Archives

    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    September 2018
    November 2017
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014

    RSS Feed

Consulting
Training
Writing
Speaking 
Advice
Contact

 © 2020 Jon Ingham. All Rights Reserved
jon@joningham.com  |  +44 7904 185134
The Social Organization​
Strategic Dynamics ; Strategic HCM
HCM Blog